A battle scene and a love story

At this point, we are watching film adaptations through with the guidance of the readings we have covered.  In considering the applicability of the essays we have read so far, Tristam Shandy stands as a film capable of addressing, though maybe not answering, many of the questions posed by the authors we have read.  One being is Tristam Shandy a successful adaptation?

When I think of Andrew’s fidelity of spirit, I think of the life of Steven.  He just cannot seem to get all of the things that he wants into this film.  There are the literal disappointments like his shoes not reflecting his stature and the jacket presented not being sensible.  In his personal life, the respect he wants from every person around him, the passion he has for the assistant, the love he has for his wife and child, all of these are impossible to reconcile within the film according to which is the point of the novel.  It is not possible to get all of a man’s life within an art work.

What I love about this film is that those disappointments, as well as the disappointments of the other characters also address so many other arguments that we have come across.  The issue of the props being realistic to the period for instance is reflective of McFarlane in which he comments on a films tendency to get caught up in period details when the author did not have such considerations.

Also reminiscent of McFarlane is this idea that everyone has a “phantasy” of the story in their own mind and they expect it to be revealed in the film.  The man in charge of the battle, the star actress and reporter who think the love story is key, the assistant who thinks the dedication of the father is most poignant, all battling with the pressure of originality cause the film to just fall apart.  It is impossible for the movie to address the desires of all involved in making it.

I personally enjoyed this movie because I think it did a nice job of addressing the challenges of adaptation albeit by failing to successfully adapt (still a question).  I was also impressed by its ability to do so without failing to be a successful movie (also up for questioning).  I am not sure how someone outside of this study would feel about this movie however.


Print Friendly, PDF & Email
This entry was posted in 09 Tristram Shandy. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to A battle scene and a love story

  1. I like the idea of this film focusing on the theme of “phantasy”–so that even if it fails to be a successful adaptation, it nonetheless successfully argues a theory of adaptation around the role the reader/viewer plays.

  2. amelia daly says:

    it’s very smart, McFarlane references Burgess saying, ” every best-selling novel has to be made into a film, the assumption being the book itself whets an appetite for the true fulfillment-” all of the fans of Tristram Shandy were so thrilled at an opportunity to insert their idea of what “fulfilled” the story.

  3. I think you’re right when you say? imply? that maybe the fictional Cogan is the real Shandy. I got the same feeling as well. The entire life of a man in one movie or book, seems a bit silly.

  4. trevor11 says:

    Your post makes me rethink the movie and perhaps some of its more redeeming qualities that I felt were lost. Although Professor to your point, if thats the case, then I feel like the movie is all about the theory if nothing else, it’s as if it was meant to fail on purpose as an adaptation in order to best succeed at reader/viewer aspect of it. I just don’t see how they could achieve anything else accept for a large scale theatrical experiment or demonstration.

Comments are closed.